Browse the glossary using this index

Special | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | ALL

I

Inclusive science communication

Last update: 09 June 2022

Inclusive science communication, or inclusive scicomm, is a global movement to shift the traditional paradigm of science communication toward an approach that centers inclusion, equity, and intersectionality.

In detail, ISC as an intentional and reflexive practice and research approach that:

• Recognizes historical oppressions, discrimination, and inequities and centers the voices, knowledge, and experiences of marginalized individuals and communities in STEMM dialogue.

• Acknowledges that each person's individual characteristics (e.g., gender, race, physical ability) overlap with one another (defined as “intersectionality” by Crenshaw, 1989) and that these intersectional identities affect their status in the world (Shimmin et al., 2017).

• Further acknowledges that explicit and implicit biases (historical, cultural, experiential) of science communication practitioners and scholars influence the design and implementation of their work (Reich et al., 2010Dawson, 2014c).

• Rejects the oversimplifications of the deficit model (Trench, 2008Simis et al., 2016), in which science communicators treat public audiences as lacking relevant knowledge or experience.

• Incorporates asset-based methods that respect and value the ideas, experiences, questions, and criticisms that diverse publics bring to conversations about STEMM (Banks et al., 2007).

• Aims to cultivate belonging and engagement of audience and collaborator perspectives (Wynne, 1992Cheryan et al., 2013Haywood and Besley, 2014Leggett-Robinson et al., 2018).

• Offers a multi-scaled approach to shift organizational cultures and structures and redress the systemic problems of inequitable access to and engagement with STEMM (Anila, 2017Bevan et al., 2018).

Reference:

Canfield KN, Menezes S, Matsuda SB, Moore A, Mosley Austin AN, Dewsbury BM, Feliú-Mójer MI, McDuffie KWB, Moore K, Reich CA, Smith HM and Taylor C (2020) Science Communication Demands a Critical Approach That Centers Inclusion, Equity, and Intersectionality. Front. Commun. 5:2. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00002







Institutional Repository

An institutional repository is an online archive for collecting, preserving, and disseminating digital copies of the intellectual output of an institution, particularly a research institution.


Intellectual Property

Intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; designs; and symbols, names and images used in commerce.

IP is protected in law by, for example, patentscopyright and trademarks, which enable people to earn recognition or financial benefit from what they invent or create. By striking the right balance between the interests of innovators and the wider public interest, the IP system aims to foster an environment in which creativity and innovation can flourish.

source: WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION


Interoperability

Interoperability is defined as a characteristic of a product or system, whose interfaces are completely understood to work with other products or systems, at present or in the future, in either implementation or access, without any restrictions. 

More specifically within the interlinked information infrastructures for Open Science environment, the data  needs to be connected and interoperable, in order to provide a free and instant access to scholarly communication outputs. 

In the context of the FAIR principles, interoperability is discussed in relation to the fact that “research data usually need to be integrated with other data [...] in addition, the data need to interoperate with applications or workflows for analysis, storage, and processing”. 

Read more at: 

1. Publication Office of the EU: view.jsp (europa.eu)

2. OpenAIRE interoperability monitoring: monitor-interoperability (openaire.eu)